http://www.zimbio.com/Michael+Jackson/articles/WuEkkrM0hal/Umpteenth+mediatic+nonsense+Michael+Jackson
Das Allerwichtigste aus diesem Artikel ist die Email an das Office des Coroners mit der Frage nach dem Narcan Implantat und die Antwort von ihm:
"Diese Information ist falsch. Es wurde kein solches Implantat gefunden und wir haben auch keine keine medizinischen Unterlagen gesehen, die ein solches Implantat erwähnen."
April 15, 2013 - In these days, in which the process Jackson vs. AEG Live is going to start, the most disparate "news" are circulating as usual, and despite himself, Michael Jackson. It seems that certain "organs of information" do a race to see who says bigger one. A nonsense that various media are going through a pitiful copy-paste without verifying its validity (technique explained in this article by C.Thomson:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/charles-thomson/michael-jackson-its-time_b_482176.html )
It is as follows: "Michael Jackson, in his body an anti-drug device", and who has followed the case of Jackson's death with all its background from the beginning, knows that it is just another mediatic nonsense, because the autoptic report of the singer was slammed on the internet and discussed at the Murray trial (the doctor who killed the star) and it was broadcast in world vision as well and no one ever said a word about this mysterious device. So it wouldn't have been difficult to verify this "news", but, to have a further proof of its groundlessness, why don't write an email to the office of coroner who performed the autopsy on the body of the singer, why don't attach to the letter one of the many relative articles and don't wait for the answer and to post it later?
Doctor Harvey is from coroner's office, the Doctor Rogers:
http://coroner.lacounty.gov/htm/contact.cfm?offset=5
The e-mail has been sent to both Harvey and Rogers and Doctor Harvey answered .
It would be sufficient a little effort to stick to a certain professional ethics and to avoid to make bad impressions.
And the process has not begun yet …
PS: we have been allowed to publish the response email